You (our readers) are the jury in a case where the Pro Se homeowner is fighting against 2 high power attorney firms (yeah, 2 Goliaths against a small David)… where the homeowner was denied a jury trial. The bank attorneys say that a Steven Nagy stamp – allegedly on the backside of a note, is the “original” document. The Plaintiff bank has entered the note as an original exhibit in the complaint.
Your vote counts – what do you think? Here is the undated, incomplete, Steve Nagy stamped page – allegedly to be the back side of the original note. What do your think? Please take the poll below or write a comment.
These are copies of the alleged “original” note documents. The last page is the first photo. The endorsement is alleged to be on the back side of this page. Please examine the hole punches and the staple marks and the copier lines. First, is a Steve Nagy stamp in blank a robo-signed document? Do you think robo-signer documents should be legal? Second, does this appear to be back page given the lines, the staple marks and the Pacman hole punch?