Moreover, the investors’ transactions were securities BEFORE any faux mortgage or note was executed. No disclosure was provided to the homeowner where his collateral was going or how it was being risked. Add rehypothecation to these transactions and we have a lethal dose of corruption sizzling in fraud.
Lehman had nothing to do with the loan even at the beginning when the loan was funded, it acted as a conduit for investor funds that were being misappropriated, the loan was “sold” or “transferred” to a REMIC Trust, and the assets of Lehman were put into a bankruptcy estate as a matter of law.
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS NOT A LEGAL OPINION UPON WHICH YOU CAN RELY IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. HIRE A LAWYER.
Yes it means that technically the mortgage and note went in two different directions. BUT in nearly all courts of law the Judge overlooks this problem despite clear law to the contrary in Florida Statutes adopting the UCC.
The stamped endorsement at closing indicates that the loan was pre-sold…
View original post 955 more words