Not all courts are ignoring the law. Some are ruling for homeowners based upon basic premises contained in my articles

Total hat tip to Bill Paatalo There are two takeaways of major significance here. Review of electronic records is not review of original records.

Possession of note does not mean that debt was paid for or transferred. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-third-department/2019/526630.html

We’re getting closer and closer to the truth when the high courts begin to demand and require…

Source: Not all courts are ignoring the law. Some are ruling for homeowners based upon basic premises contained in my articles

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s