It’s the Rules of Evidence Stupid: 25 Ways in Which Foreclosure Attorneys Are Knowingly Committing Fraud on Our State and Federal Courts

Sunday, February 4, 2018 – 3 PM HST
(Rebroadcast from June 14, 2015 – Its Super Bowl Sunday – everybody deserves a day off now and then)
Upcoming Discussion for Sunday’s THE FORECLOSURE HOUR
Sundays: 3 pm (HST) / 5 pm (PST) / 8 pm (EST). Click HERE to listen.
——————————-

Not very long ago lenders filing foreclosure actions merely went into court filing affidavits that a borrower was behind in mortgage payments, offering into evidence virtually no specific documentation, not even a loan payment accounting known as the “loan general ledger.”

Notwithstanding whatever evidentiary challenges borrowers might have made previously, unlike in other areas of American Law, foreclosure judges would merely take a foreclosing plaintiff’s printed word for it. Continue reading

Advertisements

Fraudclosure Against America’s Middle Class – A War with Serious Repercussions

A Foreclosure Primer from a Washington State Paralegal.

I.             War Against America’s Middle Class.

bankers-warsWhile most Americans’ (and in fact the world’s) attention is on Syria, I would like to point out that there has been a war waging right here at home for several years, and it is far more likely to have a direct impact on you than anything overseas.

There is a financial war being waged that is arguably as damaging as any war in recent history.  Warren Buffet said “In my view, derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal”. [Click HERE for PDF – Warren Buffet on Derivatives] Continue reading

THE 3 STOOGES OF MERS – DISORDER IN THE COURT

MERS 3-STOOGESA landmark decision was made this week in Culhane v. Aurora in the United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit without a complete set of facts set out before what  appears to be its clueless judges.

The case decision, an APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS was to some degree based on the merits of standing answering the question: “Whether a mortgagor has standing to challenge the assignment of her mortgage — an assignment to which she is not a party and of which she is not a third-party beneficiary — is a matter of first impression for this court.” Continue reading